caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <sacerdot@cs.unibo.it>
To: Alain Frisch <frisch@clipper.ens.fr>
Cc: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>,
	Alessandro Baretta <alex@baretta.com>, Ocaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] XML, XSL, eXcetera
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:36:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020705183628.A31146@cs.unibo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.44.0207050123040.29164-100000@clipper.ens.fr>; from frisch@clipper.ens.fr on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:15:27AM +0200

 I am sorry to enter the discussion so late, but I am abroad attending
 a conference...

 My opinion is:

 1) We need binding to C implementations of DOM, XSLT, etc. to be able to
    do more bindings. For example, we surely want to make bindings to
    GUIs (see lablgtk) and complex widgets for rendering XML staff are
    based on DOM and related stuff.
    The binding me and Luca Padovani did for gdome2 should be considered a
    refined, complete, elegant and tested library, as the binding to the MathML
    widget. The binding to libxslt is a little toy highly incomplete,
    but I have been using it succesfully in the last few months. Moreover
    libxslt is quite performant and I know of no serious open bug or
    missing feature.
 2) XDuce-like stuff would be great but also not standard. I enjoyed
    reading the papers, but I also want to keep on using also the ugly
    but widespread XSLT.
 3) A 100% ocaml XSLT implementation is also something interesting for
    several reasons. Nevertheless I am pretty sure that it is a
    time-expensive piece of code to write, not at all as simple as it seems.
 4) Camlp4 stuff+PXP+XPath would be convenient in the short period, but
    absolutely non standard as the XDuce solution and without the advantages
    of XDuce. Camlp4 sugar would really be nice once you have a native
    XSLT implementation.

 To sum up, IMHO solutions 1-3 are different and solve different problems.
 4 is not so promising as it seems. Finally it is nice to see some
 interest in this field in the ocaml community.

 						Cheers,
						C.S.C.


> 
> Well, all this rant to say that ok, (OCaml+PXP+XPath+Camlp4) would be a
> quite appealing solution (and I would probably use it !), but calling it
> the 'ultimate language to process XML' is an overstatement IMHO.
> 
> 
> 
> -- Alain
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
PhD Student in Computer Science at University of Bologna
E-mail: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it
http://caristudenti.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot
----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-05 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-04  8:45 forsyth
2002-07-04 18:43 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-04 21:51   ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-07-04 22:43     ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-05  8:06       ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-07-06 14:15         ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-04 22:46     ` Henrik Motakef
2002-07-05  0:15     ` Alain Frisch
2002-07-05 16:36       ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen [this message]
2002-07-06 14:22         ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-08 12:29           ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0207040823410.30756-100000@vestra.bendery.md>
2002-07-04  8:34 ` Alessandro Baretta
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-03 22:59 Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-03 23:02 ` Alexander V.Voinov
2002-07-04  0:34   ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-07-04  8:33 ` Stefano Zacchiroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020705183628.A31146@cs.unibo.it \
    --to=sacerdot@cs.unibo.it \
    --cc=alex@baretta.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=frisch@clipper.ens.fr \
    --cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).