From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA24617; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:06:37 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA24627 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:06:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from str12.sobor.org (adsl-63-198-183-99.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.198.183.99]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6MM6ZT20554 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:06:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by str12.sobor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9856599860; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020722.150051.74740388.avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> To: engstad@naughtydog.com Cc: williamc@paneris.org, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml productivity. From: "Alexander V.Voinov" In-Reply-To: References: <15673.32452.130587.498649@beertje.william.bogus> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi All, From: "Pal-Kristian Engstad" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Caml productivity. Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:22:32 -0700 > Now, I am not saying that C or C++ is inherently that much better. Even > gcc's inline syntax is really awkward in practice. But I would love to see a > superior system in ocaml! So, what is needed in order to support inline > assembly in ocaml? Is it at all possible? Arity/Prolog had inline C. It was very, _very_ useful. Alexander ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners