From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA24132; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:24:19 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA24126 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:24:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dewberry.cc.columbia.edu (dewberry.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.68]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6MLOHT20030 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:24:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from there (tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu [156.111.84.180]) by dewberry.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA13827; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:24:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200207222124.RAA13827@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Oleg To: "Pal-Kristian Engstad" Subject: Games (Re: [Caml-list] Caml productivity.) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:26:04 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: "Caml-List@Inria.Fr" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Monday 22 July 2002 02:22 pm, Pal-Kristian Engstad wrote: > Now, I am not saying that C or C++ is inherently that much better. Even > gcc's inline syntax is really awkward in practice. But I would love to see > a superior system in ocaml! So, what is needed in order to support inline > assembly in ocaml? Is it at all possible? I'm just curious: are people developing console games (PS2/XBox/Gamesomething) using gcc? Is it even an option? What about O'Caml? Thanks Oleg ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners