From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA03988; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:54:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA04350 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:54:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA03373 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:33:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mel-rto3.wanadoo.fr (smtp-out-3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.233]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g719XgL17686; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:33:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.79) by mel-rto3.wanadoo.fr (6.5.007) id 3D1848E601322C49; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:33:42 +0200 Received: from iliana (80.9.105.192) by mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (6.5.007) id 3D2A78F600A92232; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:33:42 +0200 Received: from root by iliana with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aCON-0005R8-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:37:11 +0200 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:37:01 +0200 To: Xavier Leroy Cc: Sven LUTHER , John Prevost , Caml-list Subject: [Caml-list] 3.05 and future 3.06 binary compatibility ? Message-ID: <20020801093701.GA20892@iliana> References: <20020729144527.A30919@pauillac.inria.fr> <000f01c2377c$36263060$2097fea9@janxp> <86vg6xlktk.fsf_-_@laurelin.dementia.org> <20020730095833.B6564@pauillac.inria.fr> <20020730083751.GA1041@iliana> <20020730161129.A27941@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020730161129.A27941@pauillac.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: root Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hello, ... I know there will be a 3.06 release soon to fix the few bugs found in 3.05. Will this 3.06 release be compatible with 3.05, or will we have to rebuild all the libraries that were built with 3.05 for 3.06 ? I know you strongly recommend that libraries are rebuilt for each new ocaml version, but a parsing bug hardly seem to affect binary compatibility. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners