From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA14627; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:10:11 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA14668 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:10:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from web11207.mail.yahoo.com (web11207.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.189]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g76BA8129991 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:10:08 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <20020806111007.52002.qmail@web11207.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.224.189.78] by web11207.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 06 Aug 2002 04:10:07 PDT Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:10:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Noel Welsh Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-3.05: a performance experience To: John Max Skaller Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <021e01c23c9c$86d0c9b0$240f2744@cc1003186f> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk --- Mike Lin , impersonating John Max Skaller, wrote: > > I'm intrigued by the relationship between these > two parsers. I wonder if this is related to the difference between lazy and strict evaluation. It seems that pull code falls naturally out of a lazy model, and push out of a strict model. Given no side effects that transformation between the two is trivial. Things get funky if you allow side effects. Maybe monads help here? Noel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners