From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA27062; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:38:13 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA27153 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:38:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from boule.etirade.com (12-247-44-244.client.attbi.com [12.247.44.244]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g76Nc7114904 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:38:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 19880 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2002 23:38:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ciabatta.etirade.com) (192.168.1.6) by boule.etirade.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2002 23:38:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jeffrey Palmer To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-mode-3.05 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:37:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <20020805154908L.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20020805154908L.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200208061837.48621.jeffrey.palmer@acm.org> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Can anyone give a quick comparison of the Tuareg ocaml mode and=20 ocaml-mode-3.05? Is the indentation better/standardized in one vs. the ot= her,=20 support for font-locking, etc. I'm using Tuareg now, but I was thinking that if this is the "standard" o= caml=20 mode, now might be the time to switch. Thoughts? =09- jeff --=20 The river is moving. The blackbird must be flying. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners