From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA06422; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:12:42 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA06386 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:09:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA28740 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:25:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g79CPkr22588; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:25:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA28708; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:25:46 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:25:46 +0200 From: Xavier Leroy To: Sven LUTHER Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Re: 3.05 and future 3.06 binary compatibility ? Message-ID: <20020809142546.A28467@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20020729144527.A30919@pauillac.inria.fr> <000f01c2377c$36263060$2097fea9@janxp> <86vg6xlktk.fsf_-_@laurelin.dementia.org> <20020730095833.B6564@pauillac.inria.fr> <20020730083751.GA1041@iliana> <20020730161129.A27941@pauillac.inria.fr> <20020801093701.GA20892@iliana> <20020801140939.A6160@pauillac.inria.fr> <20020808083702.GA734@iliana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20020808083702.GA734@iliana>; from luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr on Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:37:02AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > So, i face a problem, which can be solved by : > > o removing the 3.05 ocaml package (and upload it to > debian/experimental) and keep the 3.04 package in unstable for now > (note that experimental is not a propper debian distribution, just a > place to put packages that cannot go into unstable/testing), and wait > for the 3.06 release. > > o bump the .cmi magic numbers [...] I would recommend the first approach. The second is (1) more work, (2) a bit of a hack, and (3) not guaranteed to save you work in the end. > Anyway, it would be nice to know what the timeframe of the 3.06 release > is going to be Well, it was scheduled for this week, but a couple of last-minute bug report had to be investigated. The current estimate is aug 19-23, assuming (of course) no more bugs pop up. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners