From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA06271; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:50:27 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA06235 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:50:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [192.168.2.22] (as5300.kharkov.ukrtel.net [195.5.1.188]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7FHoOv07661 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:50:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from yrashk by openeas.org with local (masqmail 0.2.6) id 17fOnx-0L4-00; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:53:05 +0300 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:53:05 +0300 From: "Yurii A. Rashkovskii" To: Vitaly Lugovsky Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Namespace proposal Message-ID: <20020815175305.GA1290@rashko.ilt.kharkov.ua> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi Vitaly! On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Vitaly Lugovsky wrote: > No subpackages. Dots in the name does not mean any hierarchy - but just > a "name search path" hints. Just the same modules as we have now, but with > a slightly more intelligent way of name resolving. I agree with directory packaging -- Regards, Yurii. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners