[Caml-list] inconsistent assumptions over interface . . .

[Caml-list] inconsistent assumptions over interface . . .

[Brian Naylor]

How can I free myself of the "inconsistent assumptions" error?  My micro test
case has the following:

$ cat a/foo.ml
let foo x = x + x
$ cd a; ocamlc -pack -o apack.cmo foo.ml; cd ..

$ cat b/foo.ml
let foo x = x +. x
$ cd b; ocamlc -pack -o bpack.cmo foo.ml; cd ..

$ cat foo.ml
let foo a b = Apack.Foo.foo a, Bpack.Foo.foo b
$ ocamlc -c -I a -I b foo.ml
The compiled interfaces a/apack.cmi and b/bpack.cmi
make inconsistent assumptions over the interface Foo

I hope this is clear... I want to be able to reuse file names for different
components of my system. I was hoping that -pack would allow me to do this, but
it seems that it's not enough... is there a solution?


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] inconsistent assumptions over interface . . .

[Xavier Leroy]

> How can I free myself of the "inconsistent assumptions" error?  My micro test
> case has the following:

This exposes a bug in the implementation of "-pack" in OCaml 3.05.
Expect a fix in 3.06.

- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners