From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA32639; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:19:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA32641 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:19:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7J8J9T01494; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:19:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA32618; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:19:09 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:19:09 +0200 From: Xavier Leroy To: Brian Naylor Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] inconsistent assumptions over interface . . . Message-ID: <20020819101909.D31368@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20020815225500.97586.qmail@web13409.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20020815225500.97586.qmail@web13409.mail.yahoo.com>; from bwv211mail@yahoo.com on Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:55:00PM -0700 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > How can I free myself of the "inconsistent assumptions" error? My micro test > case has the following: This exposes a bug in the implementation of "-pack" in OCaml 3.05. Expect a fix in 3.06. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners