From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id DAA01643; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 03:50:02 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA01502 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 03:50:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from dewberry.cc.columbia.edu (dewberry.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.68])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7M1nxn08474
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 03:50:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from there (tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu [156.111.84.180])
	by dewberry.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA14728;
	Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:49:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200208220149.VAA14728@dewberry.cc.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Oleg <oleg_inconnu@myrealbox.com>
To: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Calling a function with a self-defined type as argument
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:50:56 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020822025344.150A-100000@first.in-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020822025344.150A-100000@first.in-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk

On Wednesday 21 August 2002 09:11 pm, Oliver Bandel wrote:


... because

> (*
>    let _ = x Line "h0oifdaji oi" ;;
>    This last one does not work: => "This function is applied to too many
> arguments"

x is applied to 2 arguments

>    let _ = x Line( "reuruhjf" ) ;;
>    This last one does not work: => "This function is applied to too many
> arguments"

still 2 (no difference whatsoever)

>    But it works in this way:
>    let _ = x (Line "reuruhjf") ;;

Now x is applied to 1 argument.

>    WHY?         (why *only* that?)
>  
>    At least the second example (with parantheses around the
>    Line's arguments) should work...?!  
> *)
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners