From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
To: vsl@ontil.ihep.su
Cc: jhw@wetware.com, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:23:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208302323.g7UNNUg19117@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208301711210.711-100000@ontil.ihep.su> (message from Vitaly Lugovsky on Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:13:43 +0400 (MSD))
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:13:43 +0400 (MSD)
> From: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@ontil.ihep.su>
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Vanier wrote:
>
> > Change takes time. I think chasing after industry acceptance of ocaml is
> > the wrong strategy.
>
> It already accepted functional programming. Look at what Microsoft
> Research have done - isn't them represent the industry?
Microsoft has a research interest in functional programming. Though that's
perhaps encouraging, it's a far cry from trying to promote FP as something
programmers should learn. C# (which they do promote as something
programmers should learn) is a long, long way from FP. Still, every little
bit helps.
Mike
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-31 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-27 3:33 [Caml-list] mixin modules paper and future? Chris Hecker
2002-08-28 8:43 ` Tom Hirschowitz
2002-08-28 19:25 ` Chris Hecker
2002-08-29 10:11 ` M E Leypold @ labnet
2002-08-29 18:47 ` [Caml-list] objective caml and industry james woodyatt
2002-08-29 22:57 ` Michael Vanier
2002-08-29 23:52 ` james woodyatt
2002-08-30 13:13 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-08-30 23:23 ` Michael Vanier [this message]
2002-08-30 2:25 ` Chris Hecker
2002-08-30 18:14 ` Jonathan Coupe
2002-09-01 9:18 ` What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry) Mattias Waldau
2002-09-01 20:15 ` Markus Mottl
2002-09-01 21:10 ` [Caml-list] wxOCaml? Dave Mason
2002-09-02 6:23 ` [Caml-list] Re: What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: objective caml and industry) Michaël Grünewald
2002-09-02 12:43 ` What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: [Caml-list] " Alessandro Baretta
2002-09-02 22:58 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-09-03 6:58 ` [Caml-list] Re: An XML standard API? (was:What kind of industry do you mean?) Alessandro Baretta
2002-09-02 18:15 ` What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry) Oleg
2002-08-30 18:14 ` [Caml-list] objective caml and industry Jonathan Coupe
2002-08-31 2:26 ` John Max Skaller
2002-09-02 18:38 ` Oleg
2002-08-30 2:21 ` [Caml-list] mixin modules paper and future? Chris Hecker
2002-08-30 18:15 [Caml-list] objective caml and industry Jonathan Coupe
2002-08-30 23:37 ` Chris Hecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208302323.g7UNNUg19117@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu \
--to=mvanier@cs.caltech.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=jhw@wetware.com \
--cc=vsl@ontil.ihep.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).