caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Berke Durak <berke@altern.org>
To: Markus Mottl <markus@oefai.at>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native threads under Debian 3.0r0
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 17:14:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020904151422.GA336@gogol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020904130151.GB1375@kiefer.ai.univie.ac.at>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Markus Mottl wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2002, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
>
> > So the answer is: a native code thread should be allocating some data,
> > otherwise it cannot be interrupted. The problem does not exist for
> > bytecode.
> 
> The main consideration is obviously native code performance. OTOH, some
> people might want to guarantee that their threads never get stuck. I
> don't know what solution would be useful for them. Maybe some runtime
> or command-line switch that trades efficiency against such scheduling
> problems.

Sorry about my ignorance, but aren't threads scheduled by the kernel
when using libpthread ? (That would make sense, since I get extra
processes when I create extra threads). I mean, aren't the threads
automatically preempted ?

If not, couldn't it be possible to preempt them automatically using
the interval timer ?
--
Berke
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-04 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-03 23:03 Berke Durak
2002-09-04  9:44 ` Markus Mottl
2002-09-04 10:15   ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-09-04 10:39     ` Olivier Andrieu
2002-09-04 13:01     ` Markus Mottl
2002-09-04 15:14       ` Berke Durak [this message]
2002-09-04 23:38         ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-09-04 14:38 ` Sven LUTHER
2002-09-05  9:17   ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2002-09-05 10:42     ` Sven LUTHER
2002-09-05 11:37       ` Stefano Zacchiroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020904151422.GA336@gogol \
    --to=berke@altern.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=markus@oefai.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).