From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id CAA31465; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 02:36:09 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA31551 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 02:36:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from apakabar.cc.columbia.edu (apakabar.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.159]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g8U0a7D07232 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 02:36:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from there (tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu [156.111.84.180]) by apakabar.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA09968 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:36:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200209300036.UAA09968@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Oleg To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] reverse-engineering DLLs Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:37:26 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <200209291740.NAA27349@hickory.cc.columbia.edu> In-Reply-To: <200209291740.NAA27349@hickory.cc.columbia.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sunday 29 September 2002 01:41 pm, Oleg wrote: > I'm curious as to how easy it is to reverse-engineer DLLs created using > O'Caml. I should have been clearer: is it easier to decompile DLLs made with O'Caml into more or less humanly readable code than it is with C/C++? If so, could this hinder their commercial use? Thanks Oleg ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners