From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA24527; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:38:16 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA24502 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:38:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mel-rto4.wanadoo.fr (smtp-out-4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.23]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g95CcE525250; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:38:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.79) by mel-rto4.wanadoo.fr (6.5.007) id 3D760D080119528B; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:38:14 +0200 Received: from iliana (80.14.240.86) by mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (6.5.007) id 3D8011E300CF90FD; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:38:14 +0200 Received: from luther by iliana with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17xoLG-00009u-00; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 14:47:34 +0200 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:47:34 +0200 To: Daniel de Rauglaudre Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 (Was: Pattern matching and strings) Message-ID: <20021005124734.GA606@iliana> References: <200210041514.RAA0000017577@beaune.inria.fr> <3D9DEE21.7040604@baretta.com> <20021005083451.A28645@verdot.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021005083451.A28645@verdot.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Sven LUTHER Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:34:51AM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > > > I really must get around to learning Camlp4. Why did no one > > teach it to me when I was at the X? > > Camlp4 is not really part of OCaml: it is just an OCaml program. > > It has been included in OCaml in version 3.04, but I have considered > since several months that it is an error, especially as the OCaml > compiler does not use it, and as some people of the OCaml team have > still considered that it is "waste of time". > > It is actually now developped separatedely (there is a separated CVS > version), and I am fighting in order that it is distributed separately > in next version 3.07. :(((( Will the streams be again part of ocaml then, or not ? Friendly, Sven Luther l> > -- > Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE > daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr > http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners