From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA26207; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:33:14 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA26066 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:33:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from quincy.inria.fr (quincy.inria.fr [128.93.8.52]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g95DXDD19663 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:33:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by quincy.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 23861) id 547B147B8D; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:41:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:41:33 +0200 From: Michel Mauny To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 (Was: Pattern matching and strings) Message-ID: <20021005134133.GB8321@quincy.inria.fr> Reply-To: Michel.Mauny@inria.fr References: <200210041514.RAA0000017577@beaune.inria.fr> <3D9DEE21.7040604@baretta.com> <20021005083451.A28645@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005124734.GA606@iliana> <20021005144259.C28897@verdot.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20021005144259.C28897@verdot.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Alessandro Baretta wrote/écrivait (Oct 04 2002, 09:38PM +0200): > I really must get around to learning Camlp4. Why did no one > teach it to me when I was at the X? Any X teacher around? :-) Daniel gave his personal point of view about what should be the status of Camlp4, whereas the question was why teachers at École Polytechnique didn't include Camlp4 in their OCaml courses. Slightly different matters. As a consequence, let me repeat that Camlp4 is still part of the OCaml distribution, as all of you noticed. Even though the process of updating Camlp4 in the CVS OCaml tree is more painful than before, the camlp4 and the ocaml/camlp4 trees get merged at least at each distribution. So, there is no reason so far to worry about the status of OCaml streams. Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote/écrivait (Oct 05 2002, 02:42PM +0200): > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 02:47:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Will the streams be again part of ocaml then, or not ? > This can be discussed with the OCaml team. Done. -- Michel Mauny Michel.Mauny@inria.fr ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners