From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA26848; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:47:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA26781 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:47:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g95DlB526863 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:47:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA29948 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:47:11 +0200 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:47:11 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 (Was: Pattern matching and strings) Message-ID: <20021005154711.C29870@verdot.inria.fr> References: <200210041514.RAA0000017577@beaune.inria.fr> <3D9DEE21.7040604@baretta.com> <20021005083451.A28645@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005124734.GA606@iliana> <20021005144259.C28897@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005134133.GB8321@quincy.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20021005134133.GB8321@quincy.inria.fr>; from Michel.Mauny@inria.fr on Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:41:33PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:41:33PM +0200, Michel Mauny wrote: > As a consequence, let me repeat that Camlp4 is still part of the OCaml > distribution, as all of you noticed. Michel Mauny gave here his personnal point of view, but told me, some time ago, that "liberty of expression" is good for research. I then use it, as it is my right, to contest the political decision of keeping Camlp4 in OCaml, which can only come to the end of Camlp4. If I say: "Camlp4 must be separated", it is just to say, to tell everybody of you, that I want to continue to work on it, to improve it, to receive your remarks and to debug it. Therefore, I continue fighting for the separation. Except, of course, if insults against my work are no more considered as "liberty of expression" and if I can be sure that these insults stop. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners