From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA32425; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:30:53 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA32761 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:30:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g95KUp503318 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:30:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA30394 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:30:51 +0200 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:30:51 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Future of Camlp4 Message-ID: <20021005223051.D30272@verdot.inria.fr> References: <200210041514.RAA0000017577@beaune.inria.fr> <3D9DEE21.7040604@baretta.com> <20021005083451.A28645@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005124734.GA606@iliana> <20021005144259.C28897@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005134133.GB8321@quincy.inria.fr> <20021005154711.C29870@verdot.inria.fr> <20021005140918.GA9357@quincy.inria.fr> <3D9F2BE3.9050304@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3D9F2BE3.9050304@baretta.com>; from alex@baretta.com on Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:13:55PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:13:55PM +0200, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > I am terribly sorry to have restarted this latent flame-war > on the status of CamlP4. I hope the best for the evolution > of the language--including such powerful extensions as a > CamlP4, and shame to me for not having learned it yet. Don't worry: Michel was right by telling that it is just a pretext for me to speak again about this problem. After all that time, I just saw that he did nothing to resolve this problem, and I just take that occasion to speak about it. Bury a conflict is never a solution. We all want that OCaml and Camlp4 succeed. In this case, things must be clear between us, and they are not. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners