From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA09686; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:09:37 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA10290 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:09:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from mel-rto6.wanadoo.fr (smtp-out-6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.25]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gA9A9aD16454 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:09:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.79) by mel-rto6.wanadoo.fr (6.5.007) id 3DA24D4D0138117E; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:08:58 +0100 Received: from iliana (80.13.50.127) by mel-rta8.wanadoo.fr (6.5.007) id 3DA24B4A013263EC; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:08:58 +0100 Received: from luther by iliana with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18ASXx-0000IR-00; Sat, 09 Nov 2002 11:08:57 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:08:56 +0100 To: Olivier Andrieu Cc: Sven Luther , malc , Eric Mangold , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml on Windows please advise Message-ID: <20021109100856.GA1125@iliana> References: <3DCC5E3A.9020308@myrealbox.com> <20021109071345.GA757@iliana> <15820.53936.892220.482633@karryall.dnsalias.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15820.53936.892220.482633@karryall.dnsalias.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Sven Luther Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:17:36AM +0100, Olivier Andrieu wrote: > Sven Luther [Saturday 9 November 2002] : > > > Perhaps some of the shortcomings are fixed with 2.x, but i doubt > > > it, after poking at the sorces a while back it felt horribly > > > misdesigned, but i wont elaborate on this. > > > > What about using ocamlsdl for interface ? > > That's not the same thing : SDL is not an interface toolkit, just a > low-level hardware access API. Basically, it has only 2 functions : > `blit' and `poll_events' (the S in SDL is for "simple", remember). Mm, i am not really all that familiar with ocamlSDL, nor SDL, but i guess you could build a ocaml based toolkit on top of it, could you not ? That said, i don't know how efficient it would be, mmm, have to look at how OcamlSDL handle surfaces. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners