From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA07113; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:26:05 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA00618 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:26:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from qrnik.zagroda (paf87.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.225.87]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAAFQ3509616 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:26:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from qrczak by qrnik.zagroda with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18AtyM-0004Mk-00 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:26:02 +0100 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:26:02 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Multiple mailing list posts Message-ID: <20021110152602.GA16562@qrnik.zagroda> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 07:00:49PM -0600, Eric Mangold wrote: > Another slightly annoying thing this would solve, is the fact that > majordomo doesn't add a reply-to field. IMHO, reply-to should always be > the list address. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ qrczak@knm.org.pl ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners