[malekith@pld-linux.org: Re: [Caml-list] exuberant ctags for ocaml ?]

[malekith@pld-linux.org: Re: [Caml-list] exuberant ctags for ocaml ?]

[Ava Arachne Jarvis]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 42 bytes --]

[Forwarded by request of Michal Moskal.]


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2600 bytes --]

From: Michal Moskal <malekith@pld-linux.org>
To: Ava Arachne Jarvis <ajar@katanalynx.dyndns.org>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] exuberant ctags for ocaml ?
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:08:49 +0100
Message-ID: <20021110130849.GA9168@roke.freak>

On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 06:19:39AM -0600, Ava Arachne Jarvis wrote:
> [Michal Moskal - Sat,  9 Nov 2002 01:41:36 PM CST]
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:20:27PM -0500, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> > > I was wondering if someone uses exuberant ctags with ocaml ...
> > 
> > I'm using OCaml-otags, that, with little patche, works very nice 
> > with vi. Another patch is need to compile it with ocaml 3.05+.
> > You can find the patches in question in:
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.nest.pld.org.pl/test/SRPMS/ocaml-otags-3.04.3-2.src.rpm
> 
> I added, I believe, sufficient string escaping (escaping '*' seems
> unnecessary, and you don't need to escape '^' since they occur after 
> the initial '^' in the format string used to print a line in the tag
> file, you don't even need to escape []...).  

I think it's safer to escape everything. For example, consider:

  let f x y = [x * y]

So I did it :-) src.rpm available in the same place with release 3.

> Also, once you get the patches finished up, remember to submit them to the
> author of otags.  :)

Hm.. I tried, but I failed to contact them. There is no email in source
distribution, and I had some problems with <moninjf@multimania.com>.
However I'm going to try again.

-- 
: Michal Moskal ::::: malekith/at/pld-linux.org :  GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept :  {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h