From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA12860; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:46:56 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA12868 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:46:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA20486 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:28:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from ep09.kernel.pl (ep09.kernel.pl [212.87.11.162]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAC8S8102036 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:28:08 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 24113 invoked by uid 566); 11 Nov 2002 21:21:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:21:08 +0100 From: Michal Moskal To: Ava Arachne Jarvis Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] exuberant ctags for ocaml ? Message-ID: <20021111212108.GA18795@roke.freak> References: <20021108232027.GL2196@alan-schm1p> <20021109174102.GA16702@roke.freak> <20021110121939.GC711@dan0032.urh.uiuc.edu> <20021110130849.GA9168@roke.freak> <20021110190755.GE711@dan0032.urh.uiuc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021110190755.GE711@dan0032.urh.uiuc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Fingerprint: CF89 1B14 11BE 1CC9 2CA3 7497 5E32 69B4 BC71 B4C2 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 01:07:55PM -0600, Ava Arachne Jarvis wrote: > [Michal Moskal - Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:09:21 AM CST] > > I think it's safer to escape everything. For example, consider: > > > > let f x y = [x * y] > > > > So I did it :-) src.rpm available in the same place with release 3. > > No, don't do that. It kills searching -- vi refuses to find the tag. > Apparently a more restricted search is used when searching for tags. Yes, you're right. After reading through the vim docs I found that tags are searched with 'magic' option off, which means only '^' and '$' are magic. '.' is not. Also '\' as quote character and '/' as a search string delimeter needs to be quoted. Therefore current version of patch quotes any of '$', '\', '/', which seems to work fine. > Also, source rpms are a bit annoying for those of us who don't use an > RPM-based distribution. A tarball would be nice to have on the side as > well, or at least downloadable patches. Sure, please check ftp://ftp.kernel.pl/pub/People/malekith/ocaml/ for patches and patched tarball. Please contact me in case of problems. -- : Michal Moskal ::::: malekith/at/pld-linux.org : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners