From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA01401; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:14:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA01099 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:14:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from palrel10.hp.com (palrel10.hp.com [156.153.255.245]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAF9EaX01483; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:14:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from postbox.india.hp.com (postbox.india.hp.com [15.10.45.1]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8B3C003BB; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:14:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (koshy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postbox.india.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with SMTP id OAA10510; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:45:18 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: <200211150915.OAA10510@postbox.india.hp.com> X-Authentication-Warning: postbox.india.hp.com: koshy@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Xavier Leroy Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] The need for opcode GRAB? Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:45:16 +0530 From: A Joseph Koshy Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Perhaps a basic question about the O'Caml bytecode interpreter: Why do we need to check at runtime if a function is being partially applied? Isn't this information available to the compiler? Regards, Koshy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners