From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA31851; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:32:52 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA31930 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:32:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAGEWo124537 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 15:32:50 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200211161432.gAGEWo124537@nez-perce.inria.fr> Received: from there oleg_inconnu@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [156.111.84.180] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.14 $ on Novell NetWare; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 07:32:55 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Oleg To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] native code toplevel Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:32:40 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi I found the same question in the archives, but with no answers: why isn't there a native code toplevel? Sometimes I need high performance and interactivity (CMUCL can do it, why not O'Caml?) Oleg ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners