caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
Cc: james woodyatt <jhw@wetware.com>,
	Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>, The Trade <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why systhreads?
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:49:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021126064901.GB1126@iliana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20021125134858.037b4ef8@localhost>

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:20:11PM -0800, Chris Hecker wrote:
> 
> >If you want your application to parallelize well, the winning design 
> >pattern seems to be message passing between distributed memory processes.
> 
> I was going to let it drop after the "lecture" (which should be put in a 
> faq or something), but come on, this is a silly generalization.  I have 
> colleagues who have gotten very large speedups from hyperthreading on 
> commercial applications, not demos.  The point is, it's "free" for Intel to 
> put it in, and your app is waiting on cache misses and pipeline stalls 
> anyway, so you might as well do something with those cycles.  Now you can 
> get extra work done during those times in C, but you won't be able to in 
> caml, and that's a bummer.  It's not a showstopper, since you can always 
> call out to C, but it is yet another thing in the list of features that 
> aren't natively exploitable in caml.  Of course there's a cost to enabling 
> this in caml, and it may be that there's no good way to do it or that it's 
> not worth it cost/benefit-wise, but saying "you don't want to do it anyway" 
> is just apologist.
> 
> Xavier saying 1.5x is not worth it is really strange to me; most 
> performance sensitive programmers I know would kill their mother to get 
> 1.5x.  I wonder what factor would be worth it for Xavier?

I think he said that the 1.5x would not cover the cost of adding smp
support in the first place. Apart from the fact that the added cost will
also be incurred by the single processor people, and, well HT technology
is all fine, but there will be some time before it is widely available.
Maybe then this issue will come up again, and another response will be
made.

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-26  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-23  9:08 Lauri Alanko
2002-11-24  7:36 ` Sven Luther
2002-11-24 17:41   ` Chris Hecker
2002-11-24 18:12     ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2002-11-24 21:10       ` Christopher Quinn
2002-11-24 17:14 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-11-24 17:18   ` Lauri Alanko
2002-11-24 18:27   ` Dmitry Bely
2002-11-24 23:14     ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-11-27 14:33       ` Tim Freeman
2002-11-29 13:25         ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-11-25 10:01 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-11-25 14:20   ` Markus Mottl
2002-11-25 19:01   ` Blair Zajac
2002-11-25 21:06     ` james woodyatt
2002-11-25 22:20       ` Chris Hecker
2002-11-26  6:49         ` Sven Luther [this message]
2002-11-27 13:12         ` Damien Doligez
2002-11-27 18:04           ` Chris Hecker
2002-11-27 21:04             ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-11-27 21:45               ` [Caml-list] Calling ocaml from external threads Quetzalcoatl Bradley
2002-11-26  9:02     ` [Caml-list] Why systhreads? Xavier Leroy
2002-11-26  9:29       ` Sven Luther
2002-11-26  9:34         ` Xavier Leroy
2002-11-26  9:39           ` Sven Luther
2002-11-26 18:42       ` Chris Hecker
2002-11-26 19:04   ` Dave Berry
2002-11-27  0:07   ` Lauri Alanko
2002-11-26 19:23 Gregory Morrisett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021126064901.GB1126@iliana \
    --to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=blair@orcaware.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=checker@d6.com \
    --cc=jhw@wetware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).