From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA03858; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 22:52:49 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA03824 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 22:52:48 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from opus.davidb.org (66-27-72-19.san.rr.com [66.27.72.19]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gB7LqjX01431; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 22:52:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from davidb by opus.davidb.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 18KmsN-00027J-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 13:52:43 -0800 Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:52:43 -0800 From: David Brown To: Xavier Leroy Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH , David Brown , Caml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Memory leak with native code. Message-ID: <20021207215243.GA6091@opus.davidb.org> References: <20021205184846.GA30014@opus.davidb.org> <15855.46993.822199.934318@hector.lesours> <20021207114236.B23052@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021207114236.B23052@pauillac.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:42:36AM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote: > That would explain why a program compiled to native code uses more > stack space than when compiled to byte code. However, there is no > evidence that David's problem is related to stack space. It gets even stranger. After doing a make clean, and recompiling everything, the memory leak now appears to be gone. Dave ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners