[Caml-list] Qualification of record fields

[Caml-list] Qualification of record fields

[Eray Ozkural]

Hi,

I've got a simple code that does some Unix
    if src_stats.st_kind != Unix.S_REG then exit 1 else ();

My problem is that I have to do
open Unix
for st_kind field to be available. Isn't that kind of strange? I want to use 
Unix without opening it, qualifying symbols whenever necessary.

Thanks,

-- 
Eray Ozkural <eozk@bicom-inc.com>
Software Engineer, BICOM Inc.
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] Qualification of record fields

[Sven Luther]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:43:11AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've got a simple code that does some Unix
>     if src_stats.st_kind != Unix.S_REG then exit 1 else ();
> 
> My problem is that I have to do
> open Unix
> for st_kind field to be available. Isn't that kind of strange? I want to use 
> Unix without opening it, qualifying symbols whenever necessary.

What about :

  if src_stats.Unix.st_kind != Unix.S_REG then exit 1 else ();

?

Friendly,

Sven Luther
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] Qualification of record fields

[Pierre Weis]

Hi,

> I've got a simple code that does some Unix
>     if src_stats.st_kind != Unix.S_REG then exit 1 else ();
> 
> My problem is that I have to do
> open Unix
> for st_kind field to be available. Isn't that kind of strange? I want to use 
> Unix without opening it, qualifying symbols whenever necessary.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Eray Ozkural <eozk@bicom-inc.com>

You just have to qualify st_kind: qualification in Caml is usable for
labels also. Hence, use:

if src_stats.Unix.st_kind != Unix.S_REG then exit 1;

Pierre Weis

INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] Qualification of record fields

[Eray Ozkural]

Hi Pierre and others, thanks for the info.

On Monday 23 December 2002 12:14 pm, Pierre Weis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You just have to qualify st_kind: qualification in Caml is usable for
> labels also. Hence, use:
>
> if src_stats.Unix.st_kind != Unix.S_REG then exit 1;
>

Not taking into account the capitalization rules I naively had tried:
src_stats.(Unix.st_kind)
:P

Merry Xmas,

-- 
Eray Ozkural <eozk@bicom-inc.com>
Software Engineer, BICOM Inc.
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: [Caml-list] Qualification of record fields

[Pierre Weis]

> Not taking into account the capitalization rules I naively had tried:
> src_stats.(Unix.st_kind)
> :P

The parens are not only useless here: they are harmful since the
compiler parses a vector access as in v.(i) !

> Merry Xmas,
> 
> -- 
> Eray Ozkural <eozk@bicom-inc.com>

Merry Christmas to you also,

Pierre Weis

INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners