From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA09508; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:49:19 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA09866 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:49:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from dux.ru (ns.dux.ru [193.125.210.65]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gBPAnHH28652 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:49:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from dux.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dux.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBPAslhW060401 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:54:48 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from snob@snob.spb.ru) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dux.ru (8.12.6/8.12.1/Submit) with UUCP id gBPAslN9060400 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:54:47 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from snob@snob.spb.ru) Received: (qmail 821 invoked by uid 0); 25 Dec 2002 10:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athlon.snob.spb.ru) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 25 Dec 2002 10:56:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin To: Jacques Garrigue Subject: [Caml-list] Summary: LablGL vs CamlGL Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:37:30 +0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200212201546.12363.snob@snob.spb.ru> <200212210219.18421.snob@snob.spb.ru> <20021225113708J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20021225113708J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Cc: caml-list@inria.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200212251337.30106.snob@snob.spb.ru> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wednesday 25 December 2002 07:37, Jacques Garrigue wrote: Now we have comments from both authors. Summary: - LablGL is type-safe, CamlGL is not. - LablGL support OGL 1.1, CamlGL support OGL 1.4 with extensions (most=20 important: shaders [NV,ATI,ARB]). - LablGL support GLU 1.2, CamlGL has no GLU support. - LablGL is better for beginners, CamlGL is better for people with prior = OGL=20 knowledge. - LablGL uses Raw module, CamlGL uses Bigarray. - LablGL support all Ocaml platforms, CamlGL support only Windows (VC) an= d=20 Linux. - LablGL is better tested. Everything mentioned? Nickolay ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners