caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clemens Hintze <ml-ocaml@qiao.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: speed
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:38:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030103123829.A210@qiao.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E15B3B3.3040106@163.com>

In mailing-list.ocaml, you wrote:
> Is it normal that my ocaml program is only 2 times faster than the
> java counterpart ?(using the same method and complied into native.
> jdk is 1.4.1

I do not believe, that this is normal, to be expected, or general
case.  There are, for sure, programs that may be faster in Java than
in O'Caml. But those should be exceptions!

Also it could be, that you have a excellent written Java application,
using all performance improvements that are possible with Java and
comparing that against a poorly written O'Caml application using all
anti-performance improvements possible ;-)

Would you mind to post some code showing the performance difference? I
am very interested in that as I "sell" O'Caml as generally faster than
Java to some of my colleagues, and I do not want to be a story teller
;-)


Thanks in advance,
Clemens.

-- 
Clemens Hintze  mailto: c.hintze (at) gmx.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-03 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-03 16:00 [Caml-list] speed onlyclimb
2003-01-03 11:38 ` Clemens Hintze [this message]
2003-01-03 11:47 ` Noel Welsh
2003-01-02 16:45   ` Chet Murthy
2003-01-03 13:32 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-01-02 17:52   ` Chet Murthy
2003-01-03 14:53     ` Sven Luther
2003-01-03 15:28       ` Erol Akarsu
2003-01-02 17:53   ` Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed ) Chet Murthy
2003-01-03 15:10     ` Shawn Wagner
2003-01-03 15:56       ` Oleg
2003-01-04 18:31       ` Xavier Leroy
2003-01-18 22:49         ` Oleg
2003-01-18 23:50           ` Shawn Wagner
2003-01-20 21:23             ` David Chase
2003-01-20 21:39               ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-01-21  0:54                 ` Brian Hurt
2003-01-21 13:09                 ` David Chase
2003-01-21 13:15                   ` Daniel Andor
2003-01-21 20:26                   ` Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin
2003-01-19 10:33           ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-01-19 10:34           ` Siegfried Gonzi
2003-01-21  9:56           ` [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml Xavier Leroy
2003-01-21 15:57             ` Brian Hurt
2003-01-27 16:58             ` Daniel Andor
2003-01-28  8:27               ` Christian Lindig
2003-01-05  1:13   ` [Caml-list] speed Brian Hurt
2003-01-05  1:48     ` Michael Vanier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030103123829.A210@qiao.localnet \
    --to=ml-ocaml@qiao.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).