From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA10482; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:56:56 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA10545 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:56:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from beaune.inria.fr (beaune.inria.fr [128.93.8.3]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h0TAutr19121 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:56:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by beaune.inria.fr (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/14Sep99-0328PM) id LAA0000011460; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:56:54 +0100 (MET) From: Luc Maranget Message-Id: <200301291056.LAA0000011460@beaune.inria.fr> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What has become JoCaml ? To: Samuel.Mimram@ens-lyon.fr (Samuel Mimram) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:56:54 +0100 (MET) Cc: Caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20030129113100.1e53a9d4.Samuel.Mimram@ens-lyon.fr> from "Samuel Mimram" at jan 29, 2003 11:31:00 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > Hello. > > > I have recently heard of a version of JoCaml on OCaml's CVS (jocamltrunk) programmed with OCamlP4. I have managed to compile it ; however I have noticed that the syntax has completely changed since the last official beta version (1.07). Where could I find more informations about this version, in particular about it's new syntax ? > > Moreover, is this project being actively developped ;) or is this the last version that will ever be implemented ? > > I know I should not really have posted this here but JoCaml's mailling-list seems to be dead. > > > Thank you. > > > -- > Samuel Mimram > > Samuel.Mimram@ens-lyon.fr > ------------------- Hello, you have found the development version of jocaml. Development is currently stopped but will be restarted. Of course, there is currently no documentation about this totally unstable and non-working version. Yes there will be syntax changes. The main idea is to avoid the duplication of AST nodes of the old jocaml. Then, the typechecker is responsible for discriminating between processes and expressions. --Luc ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners