From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA05621; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:06:52 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA06107 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:06:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from cs.brown.edu (fullabull.cs.brown.edu [128.148.32.100]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h18M6of01720 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:06:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from miette (miette.cs.brown.edu [128.148.38.66]) by cs.brown.edu (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id h18M6ets004016; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:06:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from er by miette with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18hd7Y-0002vs-00; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:06:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:06:48 -0500 From: Emmanuel Renieris To: Chris Hecker Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] interface printing without generating object code? Message-ID: <20030208220648.GA11010@cs.brown.edu> Reply-To: Emmanuel Renieris Mail-Followup-To: Chris Hecker , caml-list@inria.fr References: <200302060307.h1637Ru21003@plinky.bolt-action.com> <200302060307.h1637Ru21003@plinky.bolt-action.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030207180803.03087ef8@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030207180803.03087ef8@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk It does produce both files. I will second the request. Under linux, (unix in general, I think) it is now impossible to do ocamlc -c -i foo.ml > foo.mli because when the compiler sees foo.ml, there is a foo.mli already, but there is no accompanying .cmi. -- Manos On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:09:56PM -0800, Chris Hecker wrote: > > >What do you want that's not > > ocamlc -i -c foo.ml -o /dev/null > >? > > I tried that (well, the windows version with NUL) and it didn't work. It > still generated both a cmi and a cmo. Doesn't yours generate a cmi at > least, even on unix? I want no output except stdout. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners