From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA26259; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:03:03 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA26529 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:03:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from top.coli.uni-sb.de (top.coli.uni-sb.de [134.96.68.10]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h1OB31T12353 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:03:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from gnome.at.coli.uni-sb.de (gnome.coli.uni-sb.de [134.96.68.17]) by top.coli.uni-sb.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA19647; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:03:01 +0100 (MET) From: Amit Dubey Received: (from adubey@localhost) by gnome.at.coli.uni-sb.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) id MAA17811; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:03:00 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200302241103.MAA17811@gnome.at.coli.uni-sb.de> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml standard library improvement To: brian.hurt@qlogic.com Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:03:00 +0100 (MET) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: from "Brian Hurt" at Feb 23, 2003 08:46:01 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > > In the interest of getting a move on, if I don't hear any complaints in > the next day or two, I'll start the project unilaterally. > > Brian Hi Brian (and list), I mentioned earlier on the list that I'd get a Sourceforge account. I've already done this. I wasn't very creative with the name, so it is simply (and perhaps, unfortunately) called ocaml-lib.sourceforge.net. I've got two a conference deadlines on Wednesday, so that's why I've been quiet on the list, but if all willing volunteers get sourceforge announts, I'll figure out how to allow them to do CVS checkout/checkins. I took a few mintues to get the extlib from the CDK and make a couple additions, but I haven't submitted this to the CVS yet. (Maxence - were you suggesting that we should maintain the whole CDK there, or just the extlib?) The license is LGPL, but I am convinced by Sven's comments, and I think LGPL + OCaml runtime extensions is probably best (if the goal is to eventually convince the core team to include it with the distribution). Should I try to contact the sourceforge people to ask for a change before any work is done? -Amit ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners