From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA06387; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:17:50 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA06446 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:17:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA00612 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:12:21 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from smtp2.cp.tin.it (vsmtp2.tin.it [212.216.176.222]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h1QACKT24250 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:12:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from dalamar.takhisis.org (80.180.123.108) by smtp2.cp.tin.it (6.5.033) id 3E50C314003B108D for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:12:18 +0100 Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org (lordsoth.takhisis.org [192.168.1.119]) by dalamar.takhisis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A838B906 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:12:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by lordsoth.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id B6E29707B; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:42:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:42:14 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml standard library _improvement_ NOT a new library! Message-ID: <20030226094214.GE11053@lordsoth.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ocaml References: <20030218180341.GA267@first.in-berlin.de> <20030220104343.B27056@pauillac.inria.fr> <20030220165448.GD5717@lordsoth.takhisis.org> <20030225104716.GC22351@lordsoth.takhisis.org> <3E5BE379.7040108@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E5BE379.7040108@baretta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:43:21PM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > >and/or code from the ocaml programmers. This code was supposed to > >_be_part_of_the_ocaml_standard_library_, not a fork. > Stefano, do you have authority to make changes to the Ocaml > standard library distribution? I don't. I haven't too, but coding something with the _idea_ that it will be well suited to be included in the ocaml standard library is completely different than coding a new library. For example, if you are planning do improve the standard library you surely have to get more in touch with the ocaml team to know what they think of a stdlib. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners