From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA16399; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:36:41 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA16800 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:36:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h25KadH07167 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:36:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22]) by nef.ens.fr (8.12.8/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id h25KadqZ010872 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:36:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from (george@localhost) by clipper.ens.fr (8.12.3/jb-1.1) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:36:38 +0100 From: Nicolas George To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ipv6 Message-ID: <20030305203638.GA8331@clipper.ens.fr> Reply-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <1046780981.6209.972.camel@dragonfly.localdomain> <20030304155101.X22850@speakeasy.org> <15973.49598.384964.688772@akasha.ijm.jussieu.fr> <20030305125936.GB17976@hilbert.house> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030305125936.GB17976@hilbert.house> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4 X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ceri:01 extensible:01 admittedly:01 libc:01 ecrit:01 nicolas:01 imho:01 supported:01 it'd:01 node:02 unix:02 address:96 suppose:03 storey:03 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le quintidi 15 vent=F4se, an CCXI, Ceri Storey a =E9crit=A0: > It looks good to me, but I don't suppose it'd be possible to have it > extensible to other address families? Myself, i'd like getaddrinfo > etc to handle unix addresses transparently. Admittedly this isn't > supported in any C implementation I know of, but IMHO it'd be nice. For Unix domain addresses, this is supported by the implementation given by Richard Stevens in Unix Network Programming, with /unix or /local as node name, and the path to the socket as service name. I have heard that there were a similar system in the GNU libc, but I never checked. --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (SunOS) iD8DBQE+Zl/VsGPZlzblTJMRApIiAKDIdjhNOLWm79SB9HTFdLb8Dw4s8wCgoKF/ QZGsAizPrm6RFdBH8Ft69Rk= =CReJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners