From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA02247; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:50:12 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA11671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:50:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2DKoAX25194 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:50:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id h2DKoAoj009669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:50:10 +0100 Received: from first.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with UUCP id h2DKoAI5009667 for inria.fr!caml-list; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:50:10 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: inria.fr!caml-list Received: by first.in-berlin.de via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.114) Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:35:21 +0100 (CET) From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:35:21 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Reply-To: Caml-list, please Message-ID: <20030313203521.GA534@first.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 in-berlin:01 bandel:01 caml-list:01 ceri:01 imho:01 ciao:02 wrote:03 storey:03 group:04 0000,:05 i'm:07 0100,:08 thu:08 what's:11 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:59:38PM +0000, Ceri Storey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:54:36PM +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is it possible to add a Reply-To Header-entry to the > > mailinglist-mails? > > What's wrong with group-reply? OK, if you think this makes sense? In other mailinglists, they use Reply-To . So, if I'm the only one who wants this, I can do reply to group. But IMHO it makes sense to reply to the list. If not, forget it. Ciao, Oliver ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners