From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA14237; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 22:51:28 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA14113 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 22:51:27 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from opus.davidb.org (66-27-72-19.san.rr.com [66.27.72.19]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2DLpQf19776 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 22:51:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from davidb by opus.davidb.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 18tab5-0008RV-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:50:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:50:43 -0800 From: David Brown To: Oliver Bandel Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Reply-To: Caml-list, please Message-ID: <20030313215043.GA32421@opus.davidb.org> References: <20030313203521.GA534@first.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030313203521.GA534@first.in-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 oliver:01 bandel:01 dave:03 wrote:03 group:04 suspect:05 mean:05 i'm:07 0100,:08 lists:91 www:91 thu:08 davidb:08 david:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:35:21PM +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote: > In other mailinglists, they use Reply-To . There are a lot of good reasons to not use Reply-To, just because other lists do it wrong, doesn't mean we have to: > So, if I'm the only one who wants this, > I can do reply to group. I suspect you are in the minority. Dave Brown ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners