From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA14565; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:04 +0100 (MET)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA14036 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nef.ens.fr (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2DM22f20539
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: from clipper.ens.fr (clipper-gw.ens.fr [129.199.1.22])
          by nef.ens.fr (8.12.8/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id h2DM22qZ073016
          for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from (george@localhost) by clipper.ens.fr (8.12.3/jb-1.1)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:01 +0100
From: Nicolas George <nicolas.george@ens.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Reply-To: Caml-list, please
Message-ID: <20030313220201.GA7849@clipper.ens.fr>
Reply-To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <20030313203521.GA534@first.in-berlin.de> <20030313215043.GA32421@opus.davidb.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030313215043.GA32421@opus.davidb.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4
X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 mhtml:01 troll:01 ecrit:01 nicolas:01 receipt:95 ens:06 annoyed:07 www:91 david:09 neglect:11 U4:88 george:16 reply:83 repeat:17 
X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" 
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk


--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le tridi 23 vent=F4se, an CCXI, David Brown a =E9crit=A0:
>     <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>

Receipt:

1. Imagine the worst possible implementation of reply-to adding and
   enumerate all its disadvantages.

2. Do not mention anything about what useful is expected from reply-to
   adding.

3. Neglect that the ones that are annoyed by reply mistakes are not the
   same than the ones that do reply mistakes.

4. Repeat step 1.

You get `"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful'.

<URL: http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml >

--=20
  Feed the troll

--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (SunOS)

iD8DBQE+cP/YsGPZlzblTJMRAtc3AJwMQ63PLKpDFIyQ+lu9gxXHpscBRgCgvL5Z
LABolvnp/GO7FVey8bKN1p0=
=fLqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners