From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA27459; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:45:11 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA28096 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:45:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2E9j6X16434 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:45:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id h2E9j6Vm002807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:45:06 +0100 Received: from first.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-2) with UUCP id h2E9j6K8002805 for inria.fr!caml-list; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:45:06 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: inria.fr!caml-list Received: by first.in-berlin.de via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.114) Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:05:33 +0100 (CET) From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:05:32 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Reply-To: Caml-list, please Message-ID: <20030314090532.GC382@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20030313145435.GA1708@first.in-berlin.de> <20030313155938.GA21253@hilbert.house> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030313155938.GA21253@hilbert.house> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 in-berlin:01 bandel:01 caml-list:01 ceri:01 littlebid:01 configure:02 match:02 ciao:02 wrote:03 btw:03 storey:03 sending:95 seems:05 0000,:05 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:59:38PM +0000, Ceri Storey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:54:36PM +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is it possible to add a Reply-To Header-entry to the > > mailinglist-mails? > > What's wrong with group-reply? Ok, I have looked around a littlebid. Group-Reply means answering to list AND via PM. So this means sending the mail twice. The correct solutions seems to be list-reply. It's, what I have to configure (setting a list of possible List-mailadresses, to match against, when using mutt-mailer). But, btw: many people have set their Reply-To- Field in their Mailadress, and when a mail goes to them at the privat-address, I often get the question, if this was intended, or if the answer should go to the list directly. (why?) Ciao, Oliver ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners