From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA05887; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:56 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA05953 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:55 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from smtp12.cp.tin.it ([212.216.176.206]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2QAmsf04958 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from dalamar.takhisis.org (80.117.62.104) by smtp12.cp.tin.it (6.7.016) id 3E7EC6040003CD8A for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:53 +0100 Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org (lordsoth.takhisis.org [192.168.1.119]) by dalamar.takhisis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971C6BC6F for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by lordsoth.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id 644947070; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:48:41 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Message-ID: <20030326104841.GA8502@lordsoth.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ocaml References: <3E81640C.40009@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E81640C.40009@baretta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-Spam: no; 0.00; bononia:01 caml-list:01 camlimages:01 labltk:01 alessandro:01 baretta:01 co-exist:01 cluttering:01 coexist:01 lablgtk:01 module:03 bologna:03 wrote:03 zacchiroli:03 romney:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 09:25:48AM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > > I observed that both camlimages and labltk have a module > > Any idea how I can get both to co-exist? Thanks. > This is a problem that comes up every so often: module > namespace cluttering. Some time ago I had pointed a name Yes, but the question was more specific: how can I have _camlimages_ and _labltk_ coexist? IMO, it had nothing to do with a general namespace cluttering problem. So probably we need an answer from lablgtk and camlimages authors here. Is it possible to change one (or both) of the modules' names? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners