From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id GAA30607; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:35:25 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA30195 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:35:23 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from opus.davidb.org (66-75-152-1.san.rr.com [66.75.152.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2S5ZMX29248 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:35:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from davidb by opus.davidb.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 18ymWN-00041H-00; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 21:35:19 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 21:35:19 -0800 From: David Brown To: Alessandro Baretta Cc: Chris Hecker , Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Message-ID: <20030328053519.GA15412@opus.davidb.org> References: <3E818E08.2000505@baretta.com> <3E81640C.40009@baretta.com> <20030326083345.GA2985@iliana> <3E816C13.7040507@baretta.com> <20030326105006.GA3891@iliana> <3E818E08.2000505@baretta.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20030326110515.035919b0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030327113554.0369d060@localhost> <3E83DEC4.8030307@baretta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E83DEC4.8030307@baretta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 camlimages:01 labltk:01 alessandro:01 baretta:01 submodules:01 compiler:01 syntax:02 backward:02 module:03 dave:03 wrote:03 namespace:04 suggestion:06 fri:07 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:33:56AM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > This is my suggestion: use a minor backward compatible > syntax extension to allow for namespace use. > > >Are there any other options? Did I get all of that right? > > Not that I know of. Leave the module syntax alone, and just modify the compiler a little bit to allow submodules to exist in separate files. Dave ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners