From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA13943; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:12:11 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA13766 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:12:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (fichte.ai.univie.ac.at [131.130.174.156]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h3OFC9T29930 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:12:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from erle.ai.univie.ac.at (markus@erle.ai.univie.ac.at [131.130.174.154]) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) with ESMTP id h3OFC6wf015104; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:12:06 +0200 Received: (from markus@localhost) by erle.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) id h3OFC6fd003022; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:12:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:12:06 +0200 From: Markus Mottl To: Daniel Andor Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Bigarray vs. array - mixing? Message-ID: <20030424151206.GA2778@erle.ai.univie.ac.at> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Andor , caml-list@inria.fr References: <200304231556.20335.da209@cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304231556.20335.da209@cam.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bigarrays:01 lacaml:01 lapack:01 blas:01 troestler:01 implemented:01 bigarray:01 christophe:01 interfaces:01 mottl:02 wrote:03 interface:03 library:03 algorithms:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Daniel Andor wrote: > Since I was forced to use Bigarrays for Lacaml (which is a wonderful interface > to LAPACK -- but missing some drivers. :((( ), I decided to use Bigarrays > for much of the rest of my program. In case you need specific drivers provided by LAPACK or BLAS but not yet interfaced from LACAML, there are two ways to change this situation: * Contribute code that interfaces the function. Since LAPACK is a huge library with tons of specialized algorithms, this is the preferred solution :-) * Send your wish to either or to me. It's really not that difficult to add further drivers. Just follow the numerous examples of already implemented functions. In the case of difficulties, don't hesitate to ask questions! Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners