From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA06277; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:11:13 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA06297 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:11:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from qrnik.knm.org.pl (paf87.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.225.87]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h52AB9T00387 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:11:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=qrczak) by qrnik.knm.org.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19MmHU-00005a-00 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:11:08 +0200 From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] implementing bit vectors in OCaml Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:11:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <20030601170317.002EF12F9CE@flatcoat.eecs.harvard.edu> <20030602112616.A3740@pauillac.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20030602112616.A3740@pauillac.inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306021211.07901.qrczak@knm.org.pl> X-Spam: no; 0.00; marcin:01 'qrczak':01 kowalczyk:01 qrczak:01 caml-list:01 vectors:01 arrays:01 ocaml:01 knm:01 syntax:02 uniform:02 inner:02 float:02 module:03 hack:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Dnia pon 2. czerwca 2003 11:26, Xavier Leroy napisał: > The special case for float arrays is already a bit of a hack and it > isn't clear this was a really good idea -- although it sure helps with > benchmarks :-) I don't like it, perhaps because I don't use float arrays. It makes most of the Array module useless as far as performance is concerned because they do the array kind check in all inner loops. float array should be a separate type. Unfortunately OCaml can't provide uniform syntax for accessing elements in this case and it would require separate functions like those in Array. -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ qrczak@knm.org.pl ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners