caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wolfgang Müller" <Wolfgang.Mueller2@uni-bayreuth.de>
To: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] How to find out if a function is tail recursive?
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:37:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306121637.17884.wolfgang.mueller2@uni-bayreuth.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030612141549.GA14762@redhat.com>

On Thursday 12 June 2003 16:15, Richard Jones wrote:
> I was writing the section on tail recursion in the OCaml tutorial, and
> was surprised to find out that the range function (below) isn't tail
> recursive. Or at least it causes a stack overflow on a
> large-but-not-unreasonable input value.
>
> let rec range a b =
>   if a > b then []
>   else a :: range (a+1) b
>   ;;
>
> let list = range 1 1000000;;
>
> Printf.printf "length = %d\n" (List.length list);;
>
> Can you tell me why this function isn't tail recursive, 

I'll try, just to get some brainy people review my code :-)

let my_range a b = 
	let rec r a b out_range=if a>b 
		then out_range 
		else r a (b-1) (b::out_range)
	in r a b [] ;;

The difference is that when your_range is at the end of recursion, it will 
give back the empty list. To this, the innermost "a" will be prepended to [], 
then the before-innermost "a" will be prepended to that, etc... The stack 
needs to memorize this "onion" of things that need to be prepended --> not 
tail recursive.

my_range will give back at the end of the recursion the finished result. 
Nothing has to be done anymore except giving back out_range, so we can give 
it back, and do not need to remember where we came from, except for the 
initial call.

> and share any
> useful tips on how to tell whether a function is or is not tail
> recursive?

If I remember right, in the Scheme R5RS standard document there is a very 
formal description of when things are tail-recursive based on Scheme syntax.

Cheers,
Wolfgang

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-12 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-12 14:15 Richard Jones
2003-06-12 14:31 ` Paul Steckler
2003-06-12 14:43   ` Luc Maranget
2003-06-12 16:15     ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-12 16:37       ` John Max Skaller
2003-06-13  7:23         ` [Caml-list] This is so nice John Max Skaller
2003-06-12 14:37 ` Wolfgang Müller [this message]
2003-06-12 14:49 ` [Caml-list] How to find out if a function is tail recursive? Neel Krishnaswami
2003-06-12 15:14 ` Chris Uzdavinis
2003-06-12 15:33 ` Brian Hurt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200306121637.17884.wolfgang.mueller2@uni-bayreuth.de \
    --to=wolfgang.mueller2@uni-bayreuth.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=rich@annexia.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).