From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA26317; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:45:45 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA26162 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:45:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rabelais.socialtools.net (rabelais.socialtools.net [81.2.94.243]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h5DDjgH22575 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:45:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by rabelais.socialtools.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B8B6232D8; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:45:42 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:45:41 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Dbi: proposal #1 Message-ID: <20030613134541.GD4754@socialtools.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 dbi:99 troestler:01 java's:01 christophe:01 ocaml:01 wrote:03 interface:03 benjamin:07 difficult:07 standard:07 U9:89 U4:88 stage:14 early:17 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > Here is the first proposal for a database independent interface (Dbi) > for Ocaml. It's great to see this! Two suggestions. It might be worth thinking, at an early stage, about how 2-phase commit (preferably via the XA standard) and connection pooling and can be integrated into this framework. If you try to bolt these things on later (which is what happened in Java's JDBC interface), it could be more difficult. Benjamin ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners