From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA20409; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:41:46 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA20480 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:41:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail7.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.207]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h5RHfff01611 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:41:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 8460 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2003 17:41:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apprentice.genxnet.com) ([64.81.145.152]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jun 2003 17:41:40 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:45:26 -0500 From: art yerkes To: Mikhail Fedotov Cc: Jean-Baptiste.Rouquier@inrialpes.fr, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Caml-list] interfacing C and OCaml Message-Id: <20030627124526.091cf672.ayerkes@on-demand-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <1635699383.20030627171414@kittown.com> References: <003001c33c17$343a0d80$355afac1@zofo> <54997465.20030627092459@kittown.com> <015e01c33c86$e06b79d0$7115c7c2@inrialpes.fr> <21255847.20030627125956@kittown.com> <20030627075713.5791e800.ayerkes@on-demand-tech.com> <1635699383.20030627171414@kittown.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; yerkes:01 ayerkes:01 caml-list:01 interfacing:01 lacks:01 camlprim:01 camlextern:01 dlls:01 camlparam:01 camlreturn:01 aged:99 ocaml:01 wrote:03 meant:05 mostly:06 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:14:14 +0400 Mikhail Fedotov wrote: > Hello art, > > Friday, June 27, 2003, 4:57:13 PM, you wrote: > > >> Sorry, I've made a mistake myself. I've been talking mostly about "void" vs "value" > >> issue in your examples, but this is already addressed in the manual by stating that > >> the primitive function must return value. The documentation lacks introduction into > >> the macroses "CAMLprim", "CAMLextern" etc, but they are not strictly required now > >> if you are not dealing with Windows DLLs. > Sorry, I did't pay attention very well. I meant CAMLparam, CAMLreturn, etc. -- `No, you don't understand,' the Knight said, looking a little vexed. `That's what the name is called. The name really is "The Aged Aged Man."' -- Lewis Carroll ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners