From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA19811; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:07:46 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA25723 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:07:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h76H7iT14490 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:07:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ptit-gallu.home.net (AVelizy-112-1-15-137.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.252.137]) by mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 41356C00026C for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:07:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gallu.home.net ([192.168.0.12] helo=gallu) by ptit-gallu.home.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19kRlD-0003RI-00 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:07:39 +0200 Received: by gallu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:07:42 +0200 From: "Sylvain LE GALL" Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:07:42 +0200 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is ocaml 3.07 object-file compatible with 3.06? Message-ID: <20030806170742.GA969@gallu> References: <16159.50395.271827.595003@hector.lesours> <20030725163838.GA4061@gallu.homelinux.org> <20030725180546.GA5936@roke.freak> <20030725223229.GA1430@gallu> <20030806112418.GA2333@roke.freak> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030806112418.GA2333@roke.freak> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; gall:01 le-gall:01 caml-list:01 3.07:01 3.06:01 michal:01 moskal:01 gettext:01 cameleon:01 non-standard:01 ocaml:01 0200,:01 patch:02 06,:02 string:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:32:29AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 08:05:46PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:38:39PM +0200, Debian User wrote: > > > > Are you interested in gettext ? I have write a bind to gettext function > > > > + a patch to xgettext for extracting string. > > > > > > No need to write a patch (that probably won't get accepted), you just need > > > to generate .pot file, and then run msgmarge. We got such thing for shell > > > scripts (it's 2k of perl), so it shouldn't be hard to write it for ocaml. > > > > > > > .... :-> > > > > you don't understand me : the patch is already made. I have use it > > against the code of cameleon ( around 1000 lines of code ). It works, it > > extract all strings etc. So it is done. > > I mean it won't get accepted by gettext authors, so you force users to > use non-standard version of standard tool, which is Bad Thing. It's far > easier to use standalone tool that does just one thing. > Hello, Why it won't be accepted by gettext author ? As it is written in his TODO file, he wants more langage to be accepted by xgettext. I will offer him a ocaml support. Is it not good ? Regard Sylvain LE GALL ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners