caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Moskal <malekith@pld-linux.org>
To: Tahir H Butt <tahir@acm.jhu.edu>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] comparing references
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:25:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030811192552.GA8711@roke.freak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060628087.11843.16.camel@venere.cog.brown.edu>

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:54:47PM -0400, Tahir H Butt wrote:
> I don't know for sure, so I decided to ask around. My question is this:
> given two references, when one compares them, is it just the addressing
> which is examined, or the actual content? For instance:
> 
> type symbol = Symbol of int
> let a = ref (Symbol 1) in
> let b = ref (Symbol 2) in
> let c = ref (Symbol 1) in
> ....
> 
> upon inspection, a=c -> true, and a=b -> false, as desired. 

= does structural equality. As ref is implemented as record type, there
is nothing that would prevent = from traversing entire ref-ed data structure.

> But, is this
> comparison as simple as comparing two numbers? 

It can take more time. It is even possible it won't stop on cyclic
data structures.

> I ask because my sum
> types can be big (I'm dealing with trees), so it would be good if when I
> want to check if two trees are the same, all I need to do is look at the
> references to them.

Use == if you want to compare addresses.

-- 
: Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-11 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-11 18:54 Tahir H Butt
2003-08-11 19:25 ` Michal Moskal [this message]
2003-08-11 19:57   ` Hal Daume III
2003-08-11 20:02     ` Michal Moskal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030811192552.GA8711@roke.freak \
    --to=malekith@pld-linux.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=tahir@acm.jhu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).