From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id DAA29122; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 03:31:42 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA13804 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 03:31:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from tallman.kefka.frap.net (adsl-64-162-212-212.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.162.212.212]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h8C1VXf03914 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 03:31:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by tallman.kefka.frap.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CA7FAED2E; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:31:27 -0700 From: kknowles@uclink.berkeley.edu To: Richard Jones Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: mod_caml + dynlink + parsing Message-ID: <20030912013127.GA10253@tallman.kefka.frap.net> References: <20030911183932.GA2057@tallman.kefka.frap.net> <20030911190220.GA2479@tallman.kefka.frap.net> <20030911191730.GA29733@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030911191730.GA29733@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 dynlink:01 usr:01 stdlib:01 sanity:01 hashtbl:01 misuse:01 dynlink:01 hashes:01 freshmeat:01 bug:01 faq:01 faq:01 beginner's:01 beginners:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Oops, accidentally replied only to Rich. I've learned more since then 1) mod_caml shouldn't have to be, since it didn't have to be to support Random, Array, List, etc... my standalone interpreter doesn't have to be. 2) /usr/local/lib/ocaml/stdlib.cma should provide Parsing, and objinfo shows the same MD5 as the Parsing expecting by my module. -Kenn On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:17:30PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:02:20PM -0700, kknowles@uclink.berkeley.edu wrote: > > Just an update, I've done a few more sanity checks with other parts of the > > standard library, and a module using Array, Hashtbl, List, Random works... so > > I'm convinced it is a specific issue, rather than a general misuse of Dynlink. > > A few suggestions: > > * Does mod_caml need to be linked with a .cma file to support Parsing? > > * Try running objinfo[1] on your .cmo file and also on the expected > cmo/cma which is going to supply this module, to check the MD5 hashes > match. > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj > Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - all your business data are belong to you. > "My karma ran over your dogma" > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners