caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: Vincent.Barichard@info.univ-angers.fr
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml 3.07 and optional arguments
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:24:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030930102430J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F78763D.000003.03248@lanfeust>

From: "Vincent Barichard" <Vincent.Barichard@info.univ-angers.fr>

> I've just downloaded ocaml 3.07 and compil it. But when I try to compil old
> programs, I encounter some problems with optional arguments in methods.
[...]
> Is there any changes with the use of optional arguments for methods ?

I don't remember introducing any change at that level.

Your exemple is not detailed enough that I can infer the real cause.
You should submit a bug report including a minimal set of sources
producing the error.

A reasonable hypothesis is that you have fallen into the
non-principality of optional arguments (which is explained in the
manual). Try compiling your sources with ocaml 3.06, adding the option
ocamlc -principal.

If it tells you that some use is not principal, then the cause is the
increased polymorphism in 3.07: some type sharing appearing in 3.06
does not appear in 3.07. In general more polymorphism is a good thing,
but with non-principal features it may introduce incompatibilities.
Here, this would mean that you need another type annotation elsewhere.

Byt the way, why do you write
(sol#scalarizingFunction : ?weightVector':Solution.cWeightVector -> Solution
cPoint -> float)
rather than  "(sol : #Solution.solution)#scalarizingFunction"  ?

Jacques Garrigue

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-30  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-29 18:13 Vincent Barichard
2003-09-30  1:24 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2003-09-30  3:07   ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-09-30  5:29     ` Vincent Barichard
2003-09-30 19:18 Arturo Borquez
2003-10-01  0:04 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-10-01  8:43   ` Christophe Raffalli
2003-10-01 15:45     ` Yaron Minsky
2003-10-01 15:54       ` Alain.Frisch
2003-10-01 20:28 Arturo Borquez
2003-10-01 23:51 ` Jacques Garrigue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030930102430J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    --to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=Vincent.Barichard@info.univ-angers.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).