caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] OCaml wishlist
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:29:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031021142921.GA6736@redhat.com> (raw)

After writing a fair bit of OCaml in commercial situations (although
I'm by no means an expert, and really should learn camlp4), here's my
wishlist:

1. 'return' from a function. eg:

  let foo x =
    if x < 0 then return "OSL";
    (* long & complex code *)
    return "some other string"

  I know I can do this using if ... else, but when you have multiple
  levels of if ... else you end up being indented so far across the
  screen as to make coding unpleasant. This is particularly a concern
  with writing basically imperative UI code.

  Is it possible to do something like this with camlp4? (as a stopgap -
  I still think it should go into the language)

2. abstract data type syntactic sugar:

   let hash = Hashtbl.create 16 in
   hash#add "foo" 10;		or:   hash->add "foo" 10;
   hash#add "bar" 20;		or:   hash->add "bar" 20;

   The syntactic sugar is that if a module contains a type called
   M.t (literally "type t"), and obj has type M.t, then:

   obj#call		      [	or:   obj->call ]

   is exactly equivalent to:

   M.call obj

   I think this change would help a lot of Java programmers (<gr>) who
   would otherwise tend to jump immediately on using objects, which are
   an area where OCaml is weaker.

What do other people think?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - all your business data are belong to you.
 All new technology is irrelevant until it is taken up by the public.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


             reply	other threads:[~2003-10-21 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-21 14:29 Richard Jones [this message]
2003-10-21 14:55 ` Michal Moskal
2003-10-21 16:02   ` Richard Jones
2003-10-21 17:28   ` William Lovas
2003-10-21 17:50     ` Richard Jones
2003-10-21 20:27       ` Yaron Minsky
2003-10-21 20:32       ` Yaron Minsky
2003-10-21 21:46         ` Alain.Frisch
2003-10-22  0:59       ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-10-22  2:52         ` Brian Hurt
2003-10-22 15:27           ` Michal Moskal
2003-10-21 19:46     ` Alain.Frisch
2003-10-21 15:26 ` Alain.Frisch
2003-10-21 17:38 ` David Brown
2003-10-21 22:34 Richard Jones
2003-10-22  1:14 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-10-22 13:21   ` brogoff
2003-10-23  0:31   ` Eray Ozkural
2003-10-23 16:55   ` skaller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031021142921.GA6736@redhat.com \
    --to=rich@annexia.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).